"Modern" websites consist of:
1. Trackers
2. More trackers
3. Cookie popups (They wouldn't need this if it weren't for the trackers)
4. Intentional annoying popups (Sign up to our newsletter, "Sign up to this Page using Google/Facebook", etc.)
6. Advertisements!
7. More Advertisements
8. Fancy (but useless and unnecessary) widgets
9. Finally, the content you were looking for (Less than 15% of the page)
@oklomsy If your site doesn't work without js I'm not going to use it, that's my stance on the whole thing.
@swansinflight @oklomsy I use no-script, so if I really want to use a site I whitelist some of the sources until it starts working enough, trying to be careful not to unblock trackers. The thing is if someone post a link to a blog or a news site or something that shouldn't need js, and I can't even read the text I just close the site ;)
@swansinflight @oklomsy once you have a base of some whitelistings I don't really find it to be that bad, but it might be that I'm used to using a subset of webpages that work well without js already :p
@swansinflight @sotolf @oklomsy I seem to recall running into a service recently that could scrape modern websites to be usable for really old browsers. Kind of seems like the sort of thing I want to see everywhere.
@trezzer @swansinflight @sotolf @oklomsy you recall that being called https://frogfind.com
@oklomsy @sotolf @swansinflight i use noscript in firefox for random browsing, and safari/chrome for sites i trust. if something random needs js i copy the url to a chrome incognito window
@oklomsy @swansinflight @64 @sotolf
that’s reminded me - there are some sites that don’t work in safari so I switch to Firefox, but bc I rarely use it I don’t have it set up with blockers (unless I did & forgot, which is entirely possible).
The last website I purchased something through was a nightmare. Designed to prevent me buying things I wanted.
@sotolf@social.linux.pizza @oklomsy@social.linux.pizza Unfortunately that is becoming akin to someone insisting they won't use a telephone. 🤡🌎
@sotolf@social.linux.pizza @oklomsy@social.linux.pizza You don't understand,, i NEED to show you personalised ads;; otherwise I can't afford my lifestyle,;, you wwouldn't want me to starve on the streets wwould you,,
@gloopsies @oklomsy Well, as long as your site degrades gracefully, that means I can read the text and navigate the site without js being activated I don't really have many problems with that :)
@paul @oklomsy @gloopsies That is also true :)
@paul @oklomsy @gloopsies Also "burger" menus are cancer.
@paul @oklomsy @gloopsies Well I have about 0 design sense, my usual design practice is mocking up something, and just fixing things that people find unintuitive :p which is slow, but makes basic looking things that usually are easy to use, at least after a while :p
@oklomsy It's such a good example of how profiteering ruins things, when you start using one of those "alternative frontends" for popular sites, that are way faster, don't have all the garbage, work without JS, and are generally just better, and made by volunteers for free who manage to create something better and more accessible than well-paid teams.
You get all the things you came for.
The rest is just a complete waste.
@oklomsy we let build websites the marketing staff, not the developers 🤷♂️
@oklomsy All of this costs ridiculous amounts of energy. Advertising really accelerates climate change and has always done so (even when it was limited to print). And that doesn't even take into consideration the unnecessary crap it's trying to sell us.
@oklomsy Auto-playing videos are very annoying as well.
@oklomsy some news websites seem to dedicate even less space to the actual news
@brunomiguel Oh yeah, lots of them have a "More news" section.
@oklomsy with a wider and more readable width than the actual news
@oklomsy it is always amazingly annoying... I more or less try to force my customers when building websites to accept that content goes first and you don't need all that 'fancy' looking shit on your website for it to be effective...
@oklomsy and if it's a recipe
10. The posters life-story intersperced with ads and affiliate links taking up 90% of the page with the final 10% being the recipe you went there for.
@oklomsy behind a paywall.
@dch Oof, that is somehow even worse
@oklomsy The only progress we've made over the last few decades is kick Flash to the curb. Remember how some sites used to be one big steaming pile of Flash? Especially restaurant sites and places that wanted to stand out.
I don't even like the sites that have little video bits playing. Moving stuff stresses me out when I'm trying to read. I don't care if you think it's shiny, just show me a picture or embed a video if you feel that strongly about it. Sigh.
@trezzer Yeah holy crap, I am glad that Flash is gone. Also remember Java Applets? I am glad they're gone too and also Silverlight.
@oklomsy Oh yeah. And for a while everything government-oriented was Java because you could write once, run some places sometimes. Don't miss RealPlayer and early QuickTime either. Although QuickTime VR was fun for five minutes.
@oklomsy
We somehow have to introduce those 9 things to Gemini
@oklomsy
10. Paywall once you’ve reached 25% of the content you were looking for.
Oh also:
Login buttons, Fancy styling, Useless animations, Search bars and many other things.
It's ridiculous that websites are made this way, to intentionally sabotage the user and to not care about ethical design.
These "additions" introduce technical, ethical and accessibility problems and are not useful.
So design your site with accessibility and ethical tech in mind first!
</rant>